Fighting Back for Voters: Fair Fight Action v. Raffensperger
Fair Fight Action is challenging Georgia’s unconstitutional elections policies and procedures in a historic federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State and Board of Elections.
ABOUT THE CASE:
The fight for voting rights and freedom from systemic voter suppression must happen on multiple fronts: advocacy, legislation, and litigation.
The United States Constitution and other federal laws guarantee the right to vote to all American citizens.
During the 2018 and subsequent elections, and building on a long-history of suppressing the right to vote, the Secretary of State and the Georgia State Election Board violated federal voting-rights laws. They created and enforced unconstitutional and otherwise unlawful policies, engaged in gross mismanagement, and failed to fulfill their statutory duty to ensure uniform application of election laws across Georgia’s 159 counties. The result of their failed policies has created election systems and procedures that have unconstitutionally burdened the fundamental right to vote and has particularly burdened the rights of people of color. Fair Fight Action has sought relief from the federal court to enforce federal protections and correct violations of federal law.
To address the violations of Georgians’ voting rights guaranteed by federal law, our lawsuit demands improvements to the Georgia elections system from top to bottom.
Our lawsuit, initially filed in November 2018, seeks to hold Georgia accountable for an elections system that violates various rights of Georgia voters under federal law, including:
Fair Fight Action is asking the Court to implement a remedy that includes:
This lawsuit, while focused on transforming the unacceptable, unlawful, and unconstitutional elections system in Georgia, is one that Fair Fight Action believes will further pave the way for free and fair elections nationwide. When our right to vote is imperiled in any state, all Americans are threatened.
The Court reviewed and ruled on summary judgment briefings regarding the merits of the case and jurisdictional arguments. Summary judgment is a pre-trial motion in which one party argues the case, or certain claims in the case, should not go to trial because there are no facts that remain to be determined by a jury or fact-finder, and based on the law, the opposing party should not prevail on the case or claims. After summary judgment, the following claims remain in the case and will be presented during a trial that will be determined by the Court:
- Georgia failed to properly train poll workers on the correct procedures for in-person absentee ballot cancellations in violation of the fundamental right to vote guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause; and
- Georgia’s Exact Match Policy violates the fundamental right to vote guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments, the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, and the Fifteenth Amendment.
Fair Fight Action’s claims that Georgia violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 are stayed until the United States Supreme Court issues its decision in Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee, 141 S. Ct. 221 (Mem.) (2020) (No. 19-1258). The Supreme Court’s decision is expected by the end of June 2021.
FOLLOW THE CASE
To illustrate our claims and shine a spotlight on the broken elections system of Georgia, Fair Fight Action has gathered statements from hundreds of Georgia voters in every region of our state.
If you are a Georgia voter who is interested in sharing the story of the issues you experienced while voting, or attempting to vote, in the 2018 election cycle or any subsequent election, including the 2020 primary election, the 2020 General Election, and the 2021 senate run-off election, please share your story.
Fair Fight Action Launches Freedom to Vote Fall, Redoubling Campaign to Secure Federal Voting Rights Legislation
Freedom to Vote Fall is a continuation of Fair Fight Action’s Hot Call Summer campaign to drive daily calls to Congress in support of federal
The Hill highlights Abrams’ backing of new voting rights legislation as polling shows Americans strongly support provisions in the Freedom to Vote Act and the
Fair Fight: Texas Republicans’ Rush to Redraw Congressional Maps Accentuates Urgent Need for Federal Action to Protect Our Democracy
Unless Congress Acts, Republicans Across the Country Could Use Partisan Gerrymandering to Dilute Power of Voters of Color and Help Give Republicans an Artificial House